Posted 29 Jul 2012 I remember a couple years ago Tappy changed the number of posts and images per page in a thread because the forums were running pretty slowly and the software couldn't handle something like ten images/twenty posts per page. Now that I'm pretty sure the software/hardware/whatever the issue was has improved, can we increase the image count? Ten posts per page is still fine, but more images per post, like ten, would be nice. I think there didn't used to be a limit on images but like ten or fifteen would be cool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 29 Jul 2012 Why do you need ten images per post? There is almost no reason for it. Who, other than the people who post in the pictures thread, posts that many images? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 29 Jul 2012 What if I want to put ten Eridans in my posts from now on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 29 Jul 2012 Knuckle presents an interesting counterargument to wanting ten images per post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 29 Jul 2012 Sometimes I want to post a series of images that exceeds five images and is less than or equal to ten images, and I don't want to bother everyone by leaving the last image off for the next post, which happens more often than you might think. Also, I don't really see any reason why not to, if we're capable of it, and it's only going to make the forum better for those of us who are keen to post pictures and not really change anything for those of us who don't post them that often. The only risk you're running is knuckle and eridan, and he's having midlife crises about his hero worship anyways. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 30 Jul 2012 UPGRADE THE IMAGES PER POST COUNT JUST DO IT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 31 Jul 2012 I think we should ban pheo. On the other hand, I agree. Why not 15 or something? It's not like anyone would use it much anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 7 Aug 2012 Increasing the limit could possibly increase page load time for users, which is bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 10 Aug 2012 It would depend on the images put into the posts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Aug 2012 Doesn't it already depend on that anyways Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Aug 2012 Yes but that's why there is a limit on how many you can put in a post... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites