What is this I don't even

[T1g 1503]

http://www.thepetiti...l/592647624/taf

why does this even exist? there shouldn't even be a debate on this!

WHY DOES SUPREME COURT HATE KITTENS?!?!?!

And isn't it animal abuse anyway? If this is legal, why can't there be dog fighting? (Not that I want Dog Fighting to be legal)

[Ops 2]

MY SOUL IS CRYING.

[T1g 1503]

MY SOUL IS CRYING.

[PrimaGaga 1025]

But it's so hawt.

[Cascade 741]

... :'C :'C :'C :'C who the puppy would even do that. what the hell is wrong with the supreme court?

i cannot believe the idiocy of some people.

[T1g 1503]

I think the entire supreme court has a fetish for this sort of thing

[Max 10]

Why would anybody even do this :'C

[T1g 1503]

there are some fetishes that just don't even begin to make sense.

[Max 10]

Like Smurf porn lol.

[Kaffles 17]

jesus

this just makes me want to vomit

[Linox 28]

I'm going to crush a human baby and put it on youtube, I mean by their standards it should be fine right? Just another version of freedom of speech?

These people make me sick, pathetic puppys.

[PrimaGaga 1025]

You guys are acting like this is the worst fetish out there. Sure, it's pretty bad, but what about vore? That's when you get off to being eaten yourself, I think.

Yes, I think this should be illegal, but I've heard of worse fetishes.

[Sunday 0]

Yeah, I mean. At least they weren't furries.

[Linox 28]

Maybe there are worst fetishes, but this one harms innocent animals in doing so.

If someone wants to get off by being eaten thats on them, they made the choice to cause themselves harm.

I just don't see why this isn't considered animal cruelty when it most obviously is and sickens me to know people get off seeing animals in pain or get killed.

[Dyavin 0]

The supreme court is absolutely right and you're all nuts.

The supreme court said that the act of crushing animals IS illegal, but showing film of it is not. The freedom of speech protects the right to show it, not the right to perform it. Dog fighting is still illegal, but showing a video of it on the internet? Totally legal.

What interests me is the futility of movements like this in the first place. Any petition that attempts to overturn a supreme court decision is a waste of time in the first place, but this one is compounded by the futility of the very idea that you can remove anything from the internet. There is no way to remove anything from the net. It is a wild and viral medium that the government cannot control (yet).

Yes, women killing kittens is bad. Posting a video? That's your civil right.